Introduction
When choosing an Identity and Access Management (IAM) and Identity Governance and Administration (IGA) solution, organizations need a provider that can handle complex identity challenges across both cloud and on-premises environments while ensuring security, compliance, and automation.
Fischer Identity has been a trusted leader in IAM and IGA since 2005, offering a mature, fully configurable, no-code identity management platform that integrates seamlessly with both on-premises and SaaS applications.
In contrast, OneLogin is primarily a cloud-based IAM provider specializing in Single Sign-On (SSO) and Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA). While it succeeds in managing SaaS-based authentication, it is not a true IGA solution, lacks full lifecycle management, and cannot manage on-premises passwords or complex access requirements. Large organizations requiring enterprise-grade access governance, policy-based role management, and identity lifecycle automation often need external tools or custom development to extend OneLogin’s capabilities.
This comparison highlights why Fischer Identity is the superior choice for organizations needing a robust, scalable, and enterprise-ready IAM & IGA solution instead of a limited, cloud-only authentication tool like OneLogin.
Fischer Identity vs. OneLogin: Feature Comparison
Feature | Fischer Identity | OneLogin | Why Fischer Identity Wins |
IGA Market Experience | ✅ Established leader in IAM & IGA since 2005 | ❌ Primarily an SSO and authentication provider—does not offer full IGA capabilities | Fischer Identity has nearly two decades of IAM & IGA expertise, while OneLogin remains an SSO-centric platform with limited identity governance capabilities. |
On-Premises & Hybrid IAM Support | ✅ Manages both SaaS and on-prem IAM environments seamlessly | ❌ Only works in SaaS environments—does not support on-prem identity management. | Fischer Identity fully integrates with cloud, hybrid, and on-prem IAM environments, while OneLogin is restricted to cloud-only deployments, making it unsuitable for organizations with on-prem applications, the product does support on-prem active directory. |
Password & Credential Management | ✅ Full password management across SaaS and on-prem systems | ❌ Cannot manage on-prem passwords outside of active directory, limiting usability for enterprises with legacy systems | Fischer Identity offers password management for all environments, while OneLogin only supports SaaS-based credentials. |
No-Code Configuration vs. Customization | ✅ Fully configurable, no custom code required | ❌ Often requires custom coding or external tools to meet complex IAM needs | Fischer Identity provides a no-code, fully configurable IAM experience, while OneLogin often requires custom API integrations or third-party tools for advanced functionality. |
Identity Lifecycle Management (ILM) | ✅ Full identity lifecycle automation with seamless provisioning and deprovisioning | ❌ Limited lifecycle management capabilities—not a full IGA solution | Fischer Identity has a long-established ILM framework, whereas OneLogin lacks comprehensive provisioning, requiring additional tools for full lifecycle management. |
Access Control Models | ✅ Supports Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC), and Policy-Based Access Control (PBAC) without role bloat | ❌ Limited access control capabilities—no PBAC, weak ABAC support | Fischer Identity provides advanced access controls to meet complex security policies, while OneLogin lacks flexible role and policy-based access management options. |
Identity Governance & Compliance | ✅ Full governance solution with certifications, policy enforcement, and audit logging | ❌ Lacks built-in governance capabilities | Fischer Identity ensures compliance and access review automation, while OneLogin requires third-party tools for identity governance and compliance reporting. |
Self-Service Capabilities | ✅ Comprehensive self-service portal for password resets, access requests, MFA management, and identity updates | ⚠️ Basic self-service options focused on authentication only | Fischer Identity delivers a full suite of self-service IAM features, while OneLogin is limited to basic password resets and authentication controls. |
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) | ✅ Integrated MFA with enterprise-grade policy enforcement | ✅ Strong MFA capabilities | Both platforms offer solid MFA solutions, but Fischer Identity provides deeper integration with governance policies and compliance enforcement. |
Scalability & Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) | ✅ Lower TCO with full IAM & IGA features included | ❌ Higher TCO due to limited functionality requiring additional third-party solutions | Fischer Identity’s end-to-end IAM & IGA capabilities reduce overall costs, while OneLogin may require extra investment in add-ons, custom development, or external identity governance tools. |
Key Reasons Fischer Identity is the Better Choice Over OneLogin for IAM & IGA
1. Fischer Identity is a Full IAM & IGA Platform – OneLogin is Just an Authentication Tool
Fischer Identity provides end-to-end identity governance, lifecycle automation, access control, and compliance features designed for enterprise environments.
OneLogin is primarily an authentication provider with SSO and MFA, lacking true IGA capabilities. Organizations needing automated role management, policy-based access control, and compliance reporting will find OneLogin insufficient for their needs without third-party add-ons.
2. Full On-Prem and Hybrid IAM Support – OneLogin is SaaS-Only
Fischer Identity seamlessly integrates with both SaaS and on-prem applications, making it a viable solution for hybrid IT environments.
OneLogin only supports SaaS-based identity management, cannot manage on-premise passwords, and lacks true hybrid IAM functionality—which limits its use for enterprises with legacy systems.
3. Advanced Access Control & Policy-Based Access – OneLogin is Too Basic
Fischer Identity includes RBAC, ABAC, and PBAC natively, allowing organizations to dynamically control access based on real-time attributes, business rules, and security policies.
OneLogin has only basic role-based access control (RBAC) and lacks full policy-driven access enforcement, making it unsuitable for enterprises with complex security needs.
4. Built-In Compliance & Governance – OneLogin Requires External Tools
Fischer Identity provides native identity governance tools for access certifications, audit reporting, and compliance enforcement, without requiring additional tools.
OneLogin does not include built-in identity governance and relies on external tools for governance functionality, leading to higher costs and increased complexity.
5. Lower Total Cost of Ownership – OneLogin Requires Too Many Add-Ons
Because Fischer Identity includes IAM, IGA, lifecycle management, and governance in one fully integrated platform, organizations can reduce overhead, avoid hidden costs, and simplify identity security.
OneLogin, by contrast, often requires additional investments in third-party tools for full identity lifecycle management and compliance, making it a more expensive long-term choice.
Conclusion: Fischer Identity Is the Clear Winner Over OneLogin for IAM & IGA
While OneLogin is a good SSO and MFA solution, it lacks the depth, flexibility, and enterprise readiness required for full IAM and IGA deployments. Organizations choosing OneLogin may need additional tools, integrations, or costly customizations to meet their security and compliance needs.
In contrast, Fischer Identity provides a mature, enterprise-ready IAM & IGA platform that:
✔ Has nearly 20 years of IAM & IGA expertise
✔ Manages both SaaS and on-prem identities seamlessly
✔ Includes advanced identity governance, lifecycle automation, and compliance
✔ Offers no-code configuration—reducing complexity and deployment time
✔ Provides lower TCO by eliminating the need for external add-ons
For enterprises needing a scalable, secure, and fully integrated IAM & IGA solution, Fischer Identity is the obvious choice.
🚀 Request a demo today to see Fischer Identity in action!
Request a Demo | Visit Fischer Identity